Benjamin Fleischer 68720cef4d Confirmed difference from jsonapi vs AMS not significant ... pretty clear now that the ONLY difference rendering a `user` with `include: 'posts.comments'` is that the included post's user relationship in jsonapirb is `meta: { included: false }` and AMS is `data: { id: 1, type: users}` which I guess is to avoid the user's post's comment from looking up the user? similarly, the included comment's post relationship for jsonapi-rb is `meta: { included: false}` and AMS is `data: { id: 2, type: posts }` took a bit of jq and diff to figure this out		2017-10-13 23:16:58 -05:00
..
support	Make all ids increment for uniquness and sortability	2017-10-13 22:28:08 -05:00
benchmark.rb	Assert no regressions in gem-specific JSON document	2017-10-13 22:06:42 -05:00
compare.sh	Confirmed difference from jsonapi vs AMS not significant	2017-10-13 23:16:58 -05:00
Gemfile	compare ams with jsonapi-rb	2017-08-03 08:39:02 -04:00
Gemfile.lock	Benchamrks are an app which requires us to track the Gemfile.lock	2017-10-12 15:32:42 -05:00